ML Archiv: Re: [OM] funny business

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] funny business

from Ken Norton

Subject:	Re: [OM] funny business
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 13 May 2011 13:55:41 -0500

> I hope that is an indication that business is picking up.  At least, someone
> must have a few bucks to spare.
> Hope it works out.

Although my first choice is for a 250/2 or 350/2.8, the 1000mm is a
way-cool lens to have.

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Great Idea - but not today, (continued) Re: [OM] Great Idea - but not today, Moose Re: [OM] Great Idea - but not today, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Great Idea - but not today, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Great Idea - but not today, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Great Idea - but not today, Charles Geilfuss Re: [OM] Great Idea - but not today, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Great Idea - but not today, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Great Idea - but not today, Bill Pearce Re: [OM] funny business, John Hermanson Re: [OM] funny business, Jim Nichols Re: [OM] funny business, Ken Norton <= Re: [OM] funny business, John Hermanson Re: [OM] funny business, Piers Hemy Re: [OM] Great Idea - but not today, Jim Nichols Re: [OM] Great Idea - but not today, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Great Idea - but not today, Sawyer, Edward Re: [OM] Great Idea - but not today, Mike Lazzari

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] funny business, Jim Nichols
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Definition of "Normal" <==> dans Le Théâtre du Grand-Guignol, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] funny business, Jim Nichols
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] funny business, John Hermanson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]