Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] (OT) Canyon Software

Subject: Re: [OM] (OT) Canyon Software
From: Jez Cunningham <jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:24:55 +0200
I fully agree, so i went for the S95 and love it.
Jez
On 23/05/2011, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The G12 is a sweet
> kinda-little camera for what it is. Wierd, though, because I think
> it's a neither fish nor fowl type of camera. It has the best image
> quality for a compact, but is still hampered by the fact it is a
> compact which isn't compact. So, the image-quality, although very
> good, isn't up to what a larger-sensored camera has. Being not so
> compact (but reasonably portable) the camera is just large enough that
> you wish that the image quality was just a hint better to justify
> hauling it around.
>
> The above is also my main grouse with 4/3 and m4/3 cameras. Image
> quality is decent, but not consumerate with the size of the cameras.
>
> As to the software, I've used it off and on through the years (I do
> have some Canon products) and find it competent and decent. The
> problem is that, just like any manufacturer's software (except for
> Phase One), the software will only RAW convert a single-brand of
> files. Stick with Lightroom.
>
> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz