On 6/12/2011 8:35 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> For me both Firefox an IE show changes, there is mild sharpening near the
> eye area at least. For the background artifacts mentioned by Fernando, I
> belive it is due to JPEG compression.
Eye, eyebrow, lips and, ever so slightly, part of the nose. I suppose no one
but me will see the nose part.
On 6/12/2011 6:16 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> The sharpen effects shall be easily seen with any monitor without zoom,
> . . . or you need a new glasses.
I think visual acuity may well be part of the issue. Remember, I have 20/10
(6/3) vision, I can resolve detail at 6 m
that a person with average vision can't see unless twice as close. I see
detail that most people don't.
The moment I saw the image, I was aware of a difference in focus/sharpness
between the side of the head, ear, etc. and
the eye, nose and lips. Perhaps that wasn't as obvious to others.
On 6/12/2011 2:21 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I meant to add that the image is only 800x600 so whether your monitor or
> mine we were both seeing 1:1 pixels. But blowing it up a bit must have
> replicated some pixels and made it visible to me... he of 20-20
> vision... not!
Case in point! :-)
Still, the monitor could make a difference. Pixel level contrast in the display
itself would make a difference.
Actual pixel size should also make a difference. At any given pixel dimensions,
a physically larger monitor will have
larger individual pixels - and detail will be more easily seen.
Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|