I'll switch to a big flat panel display as soon as I can get EIZO
quality at Samsung prices. :-)
ps: I'm sure my JPEGs have lots of artifacts too. But if I can't see
them on the prints I consider that I'm good to go... except for my poor
On 6/13/2011 1:38 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> CRT? I belive the problem is mainly due to the monitor. I was using a 17"
> Sony CRT since 2003, when I switched to my current 17" EIZO I found many
> previously saved JPEG files has lots of artifacts which was not visible with
> the CRT and the image was much sharper with the LCD.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Norcutt"<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion"<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 8:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [OM] (OM) Henri Cartier-Bresson The decisive moment
>> I'm using an old 17" CRT. It produces good color with calibration but
>> whether it can accurately position a single pixel is probably very
>> questionable. The pixels are also small relative to larger displays.
>> I've also been using ordinary reading glasses after my cataract
>> surgeries of almost 2 years ago. I know there are differences between
>> the left and right eyes. That doesn't seem to matter much for everyday
>> reading but critical viewing is something I don't have.
>> I do see the modifications if I magnify the view but not otherwise.
>> Chuck Norcutt
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/