I truly, truly hope this garbage is not real. How is it that the world
does not "get" the idea that, if you can already produce a camera with
a sensor the size of a thumbnail, with a retractable, excellent f/2.0
or f/2.8 zoom lens covering 24mm to about 200mm equivalent, there is
no *need* for the stupidity of an interchangeable lens camera with the
same imaging capabilities! No depth-of-field control, poor light
sensitivity, etc. What the world needs, is a modern answer to the
Leica M9! A compact, full-frame camera for professionals and
enthusiasts, not this garbage. It will go the same way as the Pentax Q
(which is not generally received with praise).
Ugh.
On 26 Jul 2011, at 4:38 AM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> http://nikonrumors.com/2011/07/21/picture-of-nikons-mirrorless-camera-mount.aspx/
>
> Presume it is a 2.5X crop and not a 1/2.5 sensor. Still smaller than
> would have thought.
> Oly has a good head start with this.
> Not holding my Breath for Can-Nik in this area, Mike
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|