Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] (OM) Resolution question

Subject: Re: [OM] (OM) Resolution question
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:58:18 -0400
Personally, I'm a bit uncertain about the third and fourth decimal 
places.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt

On 7/28/2011 4:16 AM, Piers Hemy wrote:
> Seems like you and I need to work on our technique, Chuck, 'cos everybody
> else can get exposure right first time.
>
> How does it go? "f/8.2976 and be there"?
>
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Norcutt [mailto:chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 27 July 2011 23:03
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
> Subject: Re: [OM] (OM) Resolution question
>
> The statement below is only correct for perfectly exposed images.  It
> ignores the fact that shooting raw typically gives us another stop at the
> high and low ends of the brightness scale to atone for our sins of exposure.
>
> Despite fancy meters, gray cards and 50 years of experience I still make
> loads of exposure errors.  That's why I shoot raw.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 7/27/2011 9:04 AM, Brian Swale wrote:
>> Interesting that they came to the same conclusion as me; no advantage
>> in using RAW if the only goal you have is to make an image seem sharper.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz