Chris -
>From a po-boy with lowly 5 meg cameras (G5 & C5050),
and at the risk of agreeing with Herr Mooser;
I honestly don't know how I would live with a small camera
without some kind of articulated screen.
Rick
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 8/1/2011 7:19 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
> > Chris, we all know that you want that X100.
>
> Huh?
>
> Such a completely different beast than the two mentioned. Much bigger,
> heavier and more expensive.
>
> Trades those characteristics and the large sensor for a fixed, single focal
> length lens. You are also paying a lot, in
> all three ways, for a unique viewing system that will only appeal to
> rangefinder folks. I rather like LCDs and love
> articulated ones.
>
> I'm very happy with the G11, and would be unhappy with the X100. Too big
> for pocket or belt, short of features I would
> require in something that big and heavy. µ4/3 makes little sense to me, as
> the lenses I would want to use render it
> unpocket/beltable, but at least it does have interchangeable lenses, both
> fixed and zoom. I would certainly go that way
> before an X100.
>
> A. Contrary Moose
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|