I have to say, I'm particularly fond of the OM4-Ti + 100/2. It was part of the
last of my OM gear I kept. After toting a 5D + 24-105 around, the OM + 100/2
feels really nice. I even used to think an OM + 35-80/2.8 was cumbersome.... no
more
As to beauty contest, the Xpan was nice, but its not an OM.
It is amazing how function the OM4T was for what it was. But every system has
some basic flaw. I still think the OM system requirement that the camera
provide all the force to control the aperture was such a flaw.
WayneS
At 8/20/2011 04:20 PM, you wrote:
>It is a pretty decent combination, just took a picture of mine...
>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14054139
>Only complaint about the 100/2 is the bloody silly built in lens hood, any
>ideas on how to remove it without damaging the lens?
>
>Martyn
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|