Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] IMG: The Elusive Buckeye

Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: The Elusive Buckeye
From: "Jim Nichols" <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:25:05 -0500
AF is faster and more reliable than these 81-yr old eyes and fingers, when 
tracking a moving subject.  I have a number of M42 Takumars and Leica-R 
lenses that work great for stationary subjects.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Trask" <christrask@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: The Elusive Buckeye


> >
>> I use the 35 Macro because it is Autofocus, and can focus down to almost
>> 1:1.  I have longer lenses, but they are manual focus, and, with insects,
>> that just doesn't work, at least, not for me.  I do have the Zuiko 
>> Digital
>> 14-54 Ver.1, which I use sometimes for this type of image, but 54 vs 35 
>> is
>> not much of a magnification.
>>
>
>    Ah, I didn't understand that you were using autofocus.  Never used such
> a thing myself so I don't think of it as being a factor.
>
> Chris
>
>
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> 


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz