Did you use anything to bring up the shadows/down the highlights? In
Aperture I find if I do too much of that, and then apply the
"Definition" slider, I can end up with a quiet halo (or loud one if I
turn everything up to eleventy). You can see it a little around the
rock here:
http://gallery.parknmeter.com/v/beach/rock+I.html
the dog here:
http://gallery.parknmeter.com/v/beach/dog+I.html
and around the surfboard here:
http://gallery.parknmeter.com/v/beach/surfer+I.html
I tend to see it more in the black-and-whites than the colours, though
that could be a product of being more conscious of tones there.
In the above examples, I take the approach "It's not a bug, it's a
feature", otherwise I could have Gimped around it.
But of course you said this was straight out of the camera...so...~shrugs~
Cheers,
Marc
http://www.parknmeter.com
On 15 September 2011 09:22, Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ah, this one's not cooked at all. Pretty much straight out of the camera with
> simple black & white conversion.
>
> I'm wondering if the accentuation of halos is a black & white thing, 'cause
> the halo is there in the color, too, and it appears to be a natural feature
> of the particular sky. But with conversion, it stands out more. Be
> interesting to go back and look at some black & white from bygone days and
> see if there are such effects present.
>
> --Bob
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|