Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Need new camera? G3 or ?

Subject: Re: [OM] Need new camera? G3 or ?
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 20:16:10 +1100
The Sony NEX 7 is causing a bit of a stir. Playing with one now and it feels 
pretty good. Takes heritage lenses with adapters. 24 megapixels from 1.5x crop 
sensor. SMALL.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



On 06/11/2011, at 11:06 AM, WayneS wrote:

> Life has been very busy and I apologize for my limited contributions here. 
> Not that I really have anything intelligent to contribute anymore, unlike in 
> the past when I used to know stuff, or thought I did... now-a-days I know I'm 
> not so smart.
> 
> I'm at the point where I need a new camera system. I currently have the C*non 
> 5D and some nice lenses, having passed on most of my OM gear to decent homes. 
> With the 5D and full frame, I find the bulk just too much for most of what I 
> want to do, such as travel, be discrete, and low drag, not so compatible. I 
> love my 5D, and the lenses, and when I head outhiking from home or backyard, 
> no problem, but it has become just to cumbersome a system for being discrete, 
> for travel, and as a  general carry around camera. I  guess I still miss the 
> OM-4t system, but don't miss scanning film and post processing.
> 
> So I started looking. The new Fujifilm X10 looked interesting, with f2 optics 
> and nominal zoom. But then I started looking at the Panny G3, and the size is 
> not all that much different. Not to mention the cost is similar and the 
> sensor is micro 4/3's compared to 2/3", with choices of lenses.
> 
> So, I'm looking for recommendations. Is the Lumix G3 a worthy choice for 
> putting together a small system? The G3 requires IS lenses if IS is desired. 
> Some interesting micro 4/3s  Panasonic lenses are:
> 
> 20/1.7
> 14-42 3.5-5.6
> 14-45 3.5-5.6
> 45-200 4-5.6
> 100-300 4-5.6
> 
> Not sure how well any of them perform other than reviews online.
> 
> (I'm puzzled as to why there is a 14-42 and 14-45, which seem nearly 
> identical.)
> 
> Any one have suggestions? Am I looking in the right direction for a decent 
> small system? I've always felt Olympus was innovative with systems, but their 
> performance in digital cameras was always lagging.
> 
> Also, I have no experience with EVF, something I thought I would never 
> consider, but same goes for the transition from film. It is a tradeoff for 
> small mirrorless cameras. I need some sort of viewfinder though.
> 
> I feel so out of touch and welcome any suggestions. I really need a small 
> system. But it has been quite a while since I looked at cameras.
> 
> thanks
> Wayne S
> 
> 
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
> 
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz