I don't have any video streaming other than what comes in on the cable.
Chuck Norcutt
On 11/20/2011 10:15 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> One question to your video streaming, do you have a video server? Our TV
> signal is through the air, not LAN. But we play recorded TV files through
> the LAN, both wired and wireless.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "C.H.Ling"<ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>> We have HDTV 1080i (1920x1080) signal at 12Mbit per second, it is no
>> problem to run through the wireless-N network.
>>
>> C.H.Ling
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chuck Norcutt"<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>> I don't know how to accurately calculate the data rate required to
>>> support a 60Hz HD TV since compression can make a dramatic difference.
>>> But 6-7MB second sounds woefully inadequate since I think an
>>> uncompressed image would require abut 354MB/sec. But I could be way,
>>> way off the mark. Can one do Wi-Fi streaming off cable signals today?
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/20/2011 1:23 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>>>> Depends on what you need to steam, my Linksys E3000 under 2.4GHz
>>>> wireless-N
>>>> can delivery 6-7MB per second in a short range. It is about the average
>>>> you
>>>> will get with a medium cost router.
>>>>
>>>> C.H.Ling
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Chuck Norcutt"<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> My original thought was to buy a 32" TV to hang on the wall that would
>>>>> be dedicated to displaying still images. My wife put the kabosh on
>>>>> that
>>>>> idea. She thought it would be tacky. I think the TV would cost less
>>>>> then two very large wall prints with custom frames and mattes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a very nice 20x30" Florida wildlife print by painter Ben
>>>>> Essenburg that hangs over the mantle. This one in fact
>>>>> <http://www.benwessenburg.com/Balancing%20Act_largeprint.php>
>>>>> I paid the artist less than $100 for the print but it cost me $250 more
>>>>> to frame it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are home wireless frequencies fast enough to keep up with the data rate
>>>>> of a monitor?
>>>>>
>>>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/19/2011 4:08 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
>>>>>>> Interesting. It's the first time I've seen another 15" viewer except
>>>>>> The 15" seemed the best bang for the buck as you found as well I
>>>>>> guess.
>>>>>> Sizes up to 20" and beyond are available. Some of dubious quality.
>>>>>> Don't
>>>>>> know why they are so expensive when comparableTV's of much better
>>>>>> quality are cheaper. Avoid Aluratek. Anyone know of a wireless
>>>>>> monitor?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>> --
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>>
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|