It is possible to stream HDTV through wi-fi but you need a server- a
computer with TV card, I'm using dvbviewer to watch and record TV programs.
Dvbviewer can stream video, you need another computer as client, it does not
work just with a wi-fi TV.
You can use similar device as below for wireless HDMI connection, a bit
expensive though.
http://www.brite-view.com/air_synchd.php
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 3:59 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Anybody want to sell me a few small (1 or 2GB) CF
> Now we have conflicting answers or else I misunderstood what CH said.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 11/20/2011 12:51 PM, Bill Pearce wrote:
>> The Chief engineer at the radio station where I have a part time job now,
>> and formerly asst. chief for a group of Fox stations, says this: You
>> can't
>> stream HDTV wirelessly. Won't work, across the street, house, or room. It
>> must be a wired connection. buh-dee, buh-dee, buh-dee, that's all, folks.
>> (cue music)
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chuck Norcutt
>> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 8:30 AM
>> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
>> Subject: Re: [OM] Anybody want to sell me a few small (1 or 2GB) CF
>>
>> I don't know how to accurately calculate the data rate required to
>> support a 60Hz HD TV since compression can make a dramatic difference.
>> But 6-7MB second sounds woefully inadequate since I think an
>> uncompressed image would require abut 354MB/sec. But I could be way,
>> way off the mark. Can one do Wi-Fi streaming off cable signals today?
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> On 11/20/2011 1:23 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>>> Depends on what you need to steam, my Linksys E3000 under 2.4GHz
>>> wireless-N
>>> can delivery 6-7MB per second in a short range. It is about the average
>>> you
>>> will get with a medium cost router.
>>>
>>> C.H.Ling
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Chuck Norcutt"<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>
>>>> My original thought was to buy a 32" TV to hang on the wall that would
>>>> be dedicated to displaying still images. My wife put the kabosh on
>>>> that
>>>> idea. She thought it would be tacky. I think the TV would cost less
>>>> then two very large wall prints with custom frames and mattes.
>>>>
>>>> I have a very nice 20x30" Florida wildlife print by painter Ben
>>>> Essenburg that hangs over the mantle. This one in fact
>>>> <http://www.benwessenburg.com/Balancing%20Act_largeprint.php>
>>>> I paid the artist less than $100 for the print but it cost me $250 more
>>>> to frame it.
>>>>
>>>> Are home wireless frequencies fast enough to keep up with the data rate
>>>> of a monitor?
>>>>
>>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/19/2011 4:08 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
>>>>>> Interesting. It's the first time I've seen another 15" viewer except
>>>>> The 15" seemed the best bang for the buck as you found as well I
>>>>> guess.
>>>>> Sizes up to 20" and beyond are available. Some of dubious quality.
>>>>> Don't
>>>>> know why they are so expensive when comparableTV's of much better
>>>>> quality are cheaper. Avoid Aluratek. Anyone know of a wireless
>>>>> monitor?
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|