Replying to myself ...
On 11/29/2011 3:17 PM, Moose wrote:
>> - Amazingly bright as the 3Ti focus screen is, I find the F more
>> accurate for focusing (I have three F screens to play with, trying out
>> the different ones...). Werid, eh? It's much dimmer, but shows the
>> real depth of field. Using DOF preview, you can actually *see* a
>> difference between f/2.0 and f/2.8.
> Not a fair test! Compare to an OM-1(n) or 2(n). Oly knocked down the
> viewfinder magnification from .92x to .86x on the
> later single digit bodies and the 3Ti came with a '2' series focusing screen,
> which trades off precision for
> brightness. Us a 1 or 2 with series '1' screen for comparison.
As to the F viewfinder, I found this,
"Finder coverage:Virtually 100%"
- Sounds like the OM 97%
"Finder magnification: 0.8x (with 50 mm lens set at infinity)"
- Less than the 92% of OM-1 & 2, about the same as the OM-3Ti 84%
View Finding Moose
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/