| Subject: | Re: [OM] 120 film NOT digital |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 8 Jan 2012 18:49:04 -0600 |
Image quality is comparable, but slightly different as the contrasting is unique. But the big difference is in handling. It's rangefinder vs SLR. Cumbersome and loud compared to quiet and handholdable. AG -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 120 film NOT digital, John Hudson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 120 film NOT digital, John Hudson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 120 film NOT digital, John Hudson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 120 film NOT digital, John Hudson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |