Whatever the OM-D turns out to be it will undoubtedly be a micro 4/3
camera. That won't get me back, at least as my main shooter.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/26/2012 12:39 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> It's good to see that the core group of the List is still here. Do you know
>> if anyone has heard from Tom Scales recently? I'd guess that his daughters
>> are off to college by now or married with babies.
>
> Tom doesn't hang with us Zuikoholics much anymore since he migrated to
> Nikon DSLRs, but he is doing great. He's been living here in Iowa for
> a few years, but is now moving to Florida again. He got married to a
> nice young woman, who had a toddler son and they've since had TWO sets
> of twins. The second set just a few weeks ago. So, he's now up to
> SEVEN kids. Amazing.
>
> There are a few of us 1990's list members around, but not very many.
> When Olympus killed the Four-Thirds line after the E-1 (by not
> responding to the Canon 20D), we had a huge emigration to the world of
> Canon and Nikon. Once they tasted the dark side, it was curtains for
> their OM life. We kept many of them around for a long time through
> various off-topic discussions, but eventually they filtered off, just
> like you did, for various and asundry reasons.
>
> I guess I'm not interesting enough to keep them around. :(
>
> Anyway, welcome back! The OM-D system may very well be what the doctor
> ordered. I hope Olympus doesn't screw this one up. If they do? Well
> Sony and Canon are mighty fine alternatives.
>
> AG Schnozz
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|