I agree. It does make me consider scanning again, but I don't really enjoy
that. Maybe I need to give the small, private lab in town one more chance.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: A Couple of Film Images
> On 1/26/2012 4:26 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> Moose,
>>
>> As an additional bit of information, I took a roll of Kodak Gold 200 to
>> this
>> same lab a few weeks ago, and had no problems with the CD images from
>> that
>> roll.
>
> Yeah, well, as I tried to say, the interaction of one sort of grain and
> one scanner/settings, may be quite
> disproportionately different in result from another.
>
> Now that Ken has told us what's probably going on in the scanning process,
> I can instead be surprised that it isn't worse.
>
> Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|