Simple solution. Use only the Canaan from now on.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/27/2012 9:38 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> Yes, quite wrong. ACR can't match Studio color rendition, which I
> interpret to be what Olympus designed the camera for. This is my
> biggest beef with DeepPeeve when they review Olympus raw files. Can't
> be bothered to load up Studio. I have Elements 8.0 and use it as a
> fallback when I want to see how ACR does with an image (just about
> never).
>
> Joel W.
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012, at 09:10 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> Anything wrong with using ACR for ORF conversions? You can get ACR as
>> part of PhotoShop Elements for under $80 if you look around. Since I'm
>> no longer doing portraits and swapping heads, etc. I do the majority of
>> my work these days in ACR.
>>
>> Cbuck Norcutt
>>
>> On 1/27/2012 7:53 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>>> Other than that, how'd you like Aftershot, Chuck?
>>>
>>> Has anyone compared an Aftershot raw conversion of an ORF at 100% with
>>> one done in Studio?
>>>
>>> I still might buy Sagelight, as I think it is fine for Canaan raw
>>> conversions, but I still have to convert ORFs with Studio. It's no
>>> surprise that things like this work well for Canaan just because of
>>> their penetration. One of my gripes with reviews of the E cameras is
>>> that they usually use a third-party SW for raw conversion, and why
>>> shouldn't they when it works just fine for C cameras? I keep forgetting
>>> the fact, only to rediscover it when I "go to strangers."
>>>
>>> Joel W.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|