Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] (OM) Olympus Studio

Subject: Re: [OM] (OM) Olympus Studio
From: "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:56:45 +0800
To me, output quality is the most important thing, I use DPP for Canon and
Olympus Viewer 2 for Olympus RAW files, they are free. Their workflow/
interface may not be the best but to me the quality are. I trust camera 
manufacturer's software output quality more.

For Olympus software, both Master and Studio 2 are phased out, the latest 
version is July 2009. You need Viewer 2 for the additional features found 
on their latest cameras.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


> Today I downloaded the help file from the USA Olympus site, and it was
> integrated automatically into the Studio program.
>
> The program "Olympus Master" which seems to be mainly a glorified filing
> system, can also be downloaded from the same site. I didn't.
>
> Now, having in the last few days, installed OM Studio, Sagebrush, and
> Corel
> Aftershot; I need to decide whether or not I should pay up for Sagebrush,
> with 20 days to go.
>
> With a limited amount of messing around, I couldn't see much advantage of
> any of these over FastStone.    There is a lot of learning to do, and
> compared with FastStone the screen is very cluttered with all of them.
>
> All in addition to an old version of Adobe PS, Gimp, Raw Therapee, and
> some others including time-expired SilkyPix.
>
> Any details / examples of why any of these new ones are preferable to
> FastStone would be appreciated.
>
> Brian Swale.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz