On 01/02/2012 18:10, Mike Lazzari wrote:
>> I was only considering the 70-300 for its reach....
> Are you referring to the DZ 70-300? In which case don't bother. You will
> be disappointed. Take the $$ and get the 50-200 + 1.4.
>
> Just MHO
> Mike
Interesting, I've read a few favourable reviews.
I don't think I could easily pick up the other combo for the same cash,
though.
Depending on the results of testing the 300/4.5, I may not need another
lens. Fingers crossed.
D.
--
I'm a Mac, but I'm happy with my PC.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|