These pictures are so small that they're difficult to evaluate but I
would certainly suspect the lens and/or the photographer's handling of
the camera before the camera itself.
Chuck Norcutt
On 2/9/2012 6:30 AM, Frank Wijsmuller wrote:
> Just make sure you don't buy the 18-200mm. I'm unimpressed.
>
> A friend and I visited the Dutch Maritime National Museum in Amsterdam, and
> we both took pictures of some of the paintings on display, and outside.
>
> He had a D7000 with 18-200 and high ISO (at least inside, I think
> 800-1600). I had an E-p2 with 20mm, trying to keep ISO as low as possible
> (with IS help). From the smearing of the details in the corner, however, I
> conclude that the differences are more from lens quality then high ISO. But
> I'm not too qualified, I'd welcome critiques.
>
> <
> https://picasaweb.google.com/103726771172069534440/WatVergelijkingen?authuser=0&authkey=Gv1sRgCNr2zofIn-_bSA&feat=directlink
>>
>
> I resized images for direct comparison, both were raw pictures processed in
> Lightroom. The D7000 pictures of the city and the last painting were
> seriously reduced, you can still see it in the picture.
>
> The city picture shows the D7000 having more dynamic range, but this part
> of the picture contained four times as much pixels... The picture of the
> stern of the boat shows the Olympus colors, I processed these pictures in a
> similar way.
>
> When you're done pixelpeeping you might like to watch my gallery with the
> complete pictures and more ;-)<
> https://picasaweb.google.com/103726771172069534440/AmsterdamScheepvaartmuseum?authuser=0&authkey=Gv1sRgCKzfiOfP1JCJ2gE&feat=directlink
>> .
>
> Whatever you choose, enjoy!
>
> Best, Frank.
>
> 2012/2/8 Jez Cunningham<jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> I have a Nik D7000 in my sights...
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|