Thanks, Chuck.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Crocus Without Flash
> Without flash is the much better image. It's overexposed but responds
> well to reducing the exposure.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 2/25/2012 5:01 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> The Croci were in very poor light. Here is a shot without the fill
>> flash. Perhaps, after all, it is the better image, though highlights
>> from the sun are blown in both of the images.
>>
>> Original, with fill flash:
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus85.jpg.html
>>
>> Without fill flash:
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus82.jpg.html
>>
>> Comments and critiques welcomed.
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
