Yes, the brain has shrunk too. But I think its color comprehension is
still OK. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
On 3/7/2012 11:57 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> Brains then.
>
> Joel W.
>
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> I just realized that I don't have to wait until I get back home to
>> compare images processed using the old monitor against viewing on the
>> new one. I only need to compare what was processed in the month of
>> December on the new monitor with what I see today on the old monitor.
>>
>> I, of course, can't do a direct comparison since both monitors are not
>> in the same place. But, after checking a few images done last December
>> against what I see now on the old monitor I'm perfectly happy with the
>> way they look. If the old monitor's color is off it's not by much. But
>> the horizontal size has definitely shrunk a bit.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> On 3/7/2012 9:18 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>>> I'm guessing monitor. But then it could be my monitor, though it
>>> profiles well, it pretty new, and seems close to other reference points
>>> in most respects.
>>>
>>> That's the problem with the web. We have no account of what other
>>> people actually see. Furthermore, I am slightly disturbed by variances
>>> in programs and their rendering of color saturation. For example, I am
>>> now using Sagelight fairly consistently because I like some of its tools
>>> very much. However, its rendering of the image color is slightly
>>> different from PS once I pull the image into PS for some final
>>> processes. But how much of that is illusion? Sagelight does everything
>>> it can to maximize the image on the screen, and its background is black.
>>> PS uses top and bottom real estate so that the image is smaller, and
>>> the background is gray. Nevertheless, even when I minimize the effect
>>> of these variances there seems to be a slight saturation loss in PS
>>> compared to what I might have had looking about the way I wanted in
>>> Sagelight.
>>>
>>> Then sometimes I'll come back to something I had been working on
>>> previously and wonder "Who killed a rabbit on my photo?"
>>>
>>> Maybe it *is* brains.
>>>
>>> Joel W.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012, at 07:49 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>>> Aging eyes, brain or monitor. Could be any of them or all. When I last
>>>> profiled this monitor a few weeks ago the software complained about
>>>> inability to achieve a proper black level. Also, the horizontal size
>>>> has shrunk about 5% since then. The vertical size as well but not so
>>>> much. No color effects from that but it does indicate the electronics
>>>> are aging and changing values.
>>>>
>>>> It will be interesting to view the images I've processed on this old
>>>> monitor here in Florida when I get back to my new Dell IPS panel when I
>>>> get back home.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|