Perhaps the 4D Mk1 will be mirrorless.
Chuck Norcutt
On 3/13/2012 5:15 PM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012, at 03:54 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> Joel wrote:
>>> I'm wondering what the point of doing FF is other than it helps your
>>> clients keep their legacy glass in action. It appears that Olympus can
>>> do high-quality capture on 1/4 the real estate. If Olympus seemed boxed
>>> in by the 4/3 decision, it seems now that the worm is turning and C and
>>> N are boxed by having to support FF. FF will appear to have been a
>>> bridge until the smaller sensor bodies could catch up, and maybe now
>>> they have.
>>
>>
>> So, Joel. How is that 5D working out for you?
>>
>> AG
>
> It's working out GREAT! I'm starting to think I got to it just in time.
> But except for you, I'm Canaan's worst nightmare of a customer.
>
> I hope Canaan keeps the FF bodies going on a long time, but I see it
> going the way of the E-system SLRs. The 5DmkIII seems to be what the
> E-3 was to the E-1, or maybe the E-5 to the E-3. Nothing wrong with it,
> but it just barely stays up to the speed of the treadmill.
>
> Joel W.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|