Thanks, Chuck. With the lens wide open at F4 and higher ISOs the shots were
able to be made at high shutter speeds so hand held was possible and it
worked much faster than using a tripod.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Very lovely and surprising that they're hand held.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 3/13/2012 6:48 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> I had my doubts that the rendering of the Z. 90/2 was worth the
>> substantial premium over the Viv S1 90mm that is very nice and goes 1:1
>> with little CA with the matched TC. I later saw some matched images
>> with each in a thread on FM. Even on web image could see the
>> "3D" ness of the Zuiko in these narrow dof shots. It was clearly nicer
>> though the resolution was discernibly no different. There were
>> sufficient examples to be convinced though the Viv S1 90mm isn't going
>> anywhere. That be said the Z. 80 is no slouch especially in CH's hands.
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/OMC/80F4/80F4.html
>>
>> Clearly optimized for closer to 1:1 though.
>>
>> Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|