Thanks for looking, Joel. The frame rate (60fps) of VF-2 is ok to me. My
only complaint is the ~0.3s screen return speed, which could lead to missing
shoots.
Having used the 180/2.8 for some years, I was trying to see how the 100/2
works with 4/3 and if VF-2 is ok on the field. The 100/2 produces very sharp
images but 180/2.8 do better in softening the background and has some magic
characters make it very good for portraits. Most likely the 180 will get its
job back next year.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Wilcox" <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I like the model in 6214/6413 a lot, but I think the winner is 6260.
>
> I think I would find a too-slow screen refresh rate to be a deal-killer.
> Will you go back to the 5DII next time? (The 100 did great, but it's
> hard for me to think of you doing these photos with anything other than
> the 180.)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|