One of the new features adds white balance to effects that can be brushed onto
areas of the image. This is heaven-sent, as far as I'm concerned. Those color
shifts in shadows and such are not going to be the issues they once were.
--Bob
On Mar 15, 2012, at 10:57 AM, SwissPace wrote:
> I have been playing with LR4 a bit more and must say it's looking
> pretty damn clever I think I may switch over from aperture, I take back
> my initial opinion that shadow highlight recovery was slightly better in
> Aperture and I now agree with Bob. I like the fact you can select areas
> of the image to work on - I don't think you can do that in Aperture but
> I would be very happy to be corrected ;-)
>
> On 15/03/2012 12:59, Bob Whitmire wrote:
>> I think they finally got the message. Note the full price for LR4 is
>> dramatically less than earlier editions. Now it's what, $149? That's down a
>> bit from the previous $299. And the upgrade price is down as well. My guess
>> was they see LR4 as a real game changer, and hope to make up any shortfalls
>> with volume. My guess also would be that they're right. though I did hear
>> Scott Kelby say he still uses Aperture because of the killer slideshow
>> feature.<g>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|