Yes, you are right.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>I didn't understand "screen return speed". Do you mean the time for the
> image to reappear on the screen after the shutter has fired?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 3/15/2012 1:28 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>> Thanks for looking, Joel. The frame rate (60fps) of VF-2 is ok to me. My
>> only complaint is the ~0.3s screen return speed, which could lead to
>> missing
>> shoots.
>>
>> Having used the 180/2.8 for some years, I was trying to see how the 100/2
>> works with 4/3 and if VF-2 is ok on the field. The 100/2 produces very
>> sharp
>> images but 180/2.8 do better in softening the background and has some
>> magic
>> characters make it very good for portraits. Most likely the 180 will get
>> its
>> job back next year.
>>
>> C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|