Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Olympus E-5 and OM-D E-M5 bodies

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-5 and OM-D E-M5 bodies
From: "Wayne Harridge" <wayne.harridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:18:26 +1100
The never ending problem of "classification" !

...Wayne


> 
> > You could argue that it IS a DSLR but not an SLR.
> 
> I argue that the definition of an SLR/DSLR is formfactor, not specific
> technology. The problem with tying it to technology is that every time you
> make even the most minor change to it you risk having to come up with an
all
> new nomenclature. That gets pretty nonsensical.
> 
> Same with rangefinder cameras. To me, this term applies to a
> shape/functionality/usage factor, not the specific technology used for
> focusing.
> 
> Further down the list would be point-and-shoots. This isn't just a
technology
> or even category of buyer, but a formfactor. Most of the
> m43 cameras would fall into this category, but strangely enough, so would
> the old Olympus XA even though technically it is a rangefinder camera.
> 
> That's why this whole EVIL, MSC or whever somebody tries to say just
> doesn't take off. When it comes right down to it, lens-mount flexibility
> doesn't change which of these three categories a camera will fall into.
It's a
> pretty big tent that covers each of these three categories. The Nikon 1
> system is a perfect case in point. It absolutely falls in the
point-and-shoot
> category. No amount of lens changing is going to lift it out of that
category.
> Once you slap a lens on the camera, it looks, feels and operates exactly
like
> any other point-and-shoot in the same pricing. In fact, the Nikon is
EXACTLY
> like the non-interchangeable-lens camera.
> 
> The OM-D is most certainly a DSLR even though the "R" for reflex is an
> anochronism. No more so an anochronism than the aperture and speed
> settings we can't seem to get rid of. F5.6 at 1/125... huh? On the flip
side, we
> never really called Hasselblads SLRs even though they were too. Not like
> TLRs, which definitely had an entire culture unto their own, but in that
> category we rarely differentiated between fixed-lens TLR and
> interchangeable-lens TLRs by name.
> 
> AG
> --
> __________________________________________________________
> _______
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz