I trust his "ventage" as well :-)
Coincidentally, I passed Harrods today, and saw the X-Pro1 in the window, in
display box. In the next window was a limited edition X100, in black.
So the marketing is at full throttle . . .
Chris
On 4 Apr 2012, at 19:54, Ken Norton wrote:
>> I disagree, Ken. The viewers or readers have to be able to trust the
>> reviewer. If there had been problems with the test camera the reviewer
>> should have said so, qualified, if necessary, with the "pre-production
>> software" warning.
>
> Except the problem here is that if a reviewer does a proper job of
> skewering the camera, he/she will never get another one to review. I
> will trust Andrew's ventage here over his published review anyday.
> Michael Richtmann has alluded to this disaster of a camera already but
> has withheld his own review so far. This might be an attempt on his
> part to allow Fuji to get some things fixed before he launches into
> scorched-earth mode.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|