I will try a few more brackets next time if conditions permit.
Joel W.
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012, at 04:24 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> There are a few which seem to have a busy background but only 1 or 2
> where I thought you'd have been better off with more depth of field.
> For those with a busy background perhaps less depth of field would have
> been better.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 4/8/2012 1:48 PM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> > ... spring revitalization/rebirth ritual occasion of your preference.
> >
> > Today being mine, I have put some more spring flowers in a gallery here
> > (it's the April gallery):
> >
> > http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jfwilcox/index.html
> >
> > Probably one or two too many of everything, which usually means none
> > truly makes the cut. Oh well. Appreciating your tolerance -- in
> > advance.
> >
> > OM-5D mk OLD-ONE, Z 90/2 mostly. Some of the tulips were taken with the
> > Z 50/1.2 with 12mm extension or none; the small blue flowers were taken
> > with the 50/1.2 and 25mm extension (they are tiny flowers) -- at f11 or
> > 16 there is still almost no DOF. Makes me yearn to try a bit of
> > "stacking."
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|