Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] olympus Digest, Vol 42, Issue 15

Subject: Re: [OM] olympus Digest, Vol 42, Issue 15
From: classicvw@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:18:31 -0400 (EDT)


I did, yes. Very interesting. The only ironic thing is that this will  
roduce images
equivalent" to a humdrum 35mm f/2.0 on, say, an OM camera. And the  
7.5mm Nokton would
ave to resolve twice as well as the equivalent 35mm f/2.0 to produce  
he same
mage quality, which is quite difficult to do.
Still, I have great admiration for the genuinely interesting lenses  
osina Voigtl?nder
as produced for 35mm, and for Micro4/3.
Dawid



Well, it would still be an f/ 0.95 which is interesting. ( with a 35mm 2.0 
depth of field, yes)  
I know we can use a 35 f/2 on the OM body but it's for a micro 4/3 not an OM.
I know we do, but not everyone in the world uses or prefers an OM over digital. 
And I don't think it would have to resolve twice as well to produce
the same image quality, unless perhaps you are doing very large enlargements?

I'd have to see it and feel it before I'd consider it for my PEN though.

George
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz