On 25 Apr 2012, at 5:05 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>> My goodness, that is insane! Seriously, what could I sell my 250/2.0
>>> for?
>>
>> Probably what you paid for it, if you are lucky. One (over-)price
>> doesn't
>> make a trend. Clearly the buyer is an OM fanatic on some sort of
>> perverse
>> acquisition bender. Check their recent feedback:
>
>
> Uh huh, but that didn't stop the vultures from changing thermals.
>
> AG (circling) Schnozz
I'm keeping a sharp eye out for those vultures, Ken...
I'll spot you.. uhh.. them.. ten miles away (the 250/2 will help in
that regard :-)
I do sometimes think I should quit 35mm entirely (and Moose isn't
helping, with his discussions on the subject of lens rendering) but
the only reason I'd probably sell my more exotic OM gear is if it were
the only way to raise funds for a new darkroom - I lost my old one (we
moved office space) so I am down to kitchen-sink processing, and boy
do I miss a proper one. Not much space in our (very) small townhouse -
but I might convince the body corporate to allow me to put up a small
hut outside somewhere out of sight on common property.
Dawid (wishing he was in the dark) Loubser
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|