Ok, I see what you're getting at, but perhaps a web image isn't the medium
for it. I'd looked at quite a bit of Monet's work on the web and in books
but never really appreciated it until I saw a few original paintings. I
presume the converse might also be true, some work might be impressive as
web images but not as prints.
...Wayne
>
> I'm interested in pure image, separate from source or medium.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Alt_Dot_
> Moose&image=_MG_6192fpb.jpg>
>
> I could easily have made a "good" shot of these trees @ 300 mm. But I
tried a
> shorter focal length, full pixel crop and possibly unusual processing.
There's a
> chance it might be about the essential overall visual nature of Monterrey
> Cypresses, without the distraction of details. ;-)
>
> Artistically Aspirational Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|