If it was full-frame and 3X the price I'd buy one today.
Chuck Norcutt
On 5/3/2012 12:11 AM, Moose wrote:
> On 5/2/2012 12:31 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>
>> Temptation is high, very high. It looks like a VERY nicely spec'd
>> camera for a thousand bucks. The problem I have with it is the
>> burned-factor from Olympus. It's hard to get excited about it after
>> Olympus did the "screw you" routine to the customer base again. The
>> brain says that the camera is a bargain. The heart is no longer
>> interested.
>
> Sheesh! It's a camera, a tool, dood. It's not a marriage. (Well, OK, I have
> known marriages that didn't last as long as
> your relationship with the E-1.)
>
> Pretend the name is covered with tape. If it does what you want, as well or
> better than the others you are considering,
> and the price is right, why not?
>
> Looks like a mighty fine camera. After all these years, Oly looks to have
> done a first class job of design and
> implementation, with IQ right up there. If I were looking, it would be on my
> list.
>
> Oly Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|