Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 14:24:53 -0400
But a 0.5X converter would shrink the image circle and bring in poorly 
corrected areas from outside the normal circle as well as likely adding 
significant vignetting.

Chuck Norcutt


On 5/3/2012 10:04 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> What's a killer set of m.4/3 lenses?
>
> Panasonic makes some awesome lenses. However, judging from what I've
> seen on the inside of the PanaLeica 14-50 I have, I'm not nearly so
> inclined to build up a kit of them. The 7-14 would be on my shortlist,
> though.
>
> I really don't think that m43 has a good equivalent to the DZ 14-54 or
> 12-60. Nor does it have equilent to the 50-200. So far, m43 skews to
> the normal and wide end along with excellent primes.
>
> Shame there is no 0.5x teleconverter. That OM designation could
> actually be real, not just marketing lipstick.
>
> AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz