Frank,
Thanks for pointing me to the fixed focal length lenses. They do come in
nice bright versions. Makes the m.43 system around the OM-D more attractive.
Not yet for me as I have too much invested in the E-3 and lenses and don't
want to give that up yet.
Wiliam
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Wijsmuller [mailto:wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: donderdag 3 mei 2012 16:19
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview
On the cheap but compact and lightweight would be 14mm 2.5 pana 20mm 1.7
pana (the most expensive of these three) 45mm 1.8 oly
More expensive and bulky would be
12mm 2.0 oly
25mm 1.4 pana leica
45mm 2.8 pana leica macro
Still pretty transportabel though.
You can of course pick the best in the range that suits you best, or a zoom
where you want one. Many possibilities these days...
If you want smaller depth of field therre are the Voigtlander 0.95 25mm and
17mm. Quite expensive and MF.
I have the cheap set myself and I'm quite happy with it. Nice (enough)
bokeh, it fits in your pockets if you want, and doesn't cost a fortune. It
is like a Leica outfit on the cheap with an e-px body (I expect some respons
of the "m43 isn't good enough" fundamentalists on this list ;-)
Best, Frank.
2012/5/3 Joel Wilcox wrote
>
> What's a killer set of m.4/3 lenses?
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
-----
Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
Versie: 10.0.1424 / Virusdatabase: 2411/4974 - datum van uitgifte: 05/02/12
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|