On 5/7/2012 1:43 PM, Dawid Loubser wrote:
> On 07 May 2012, at 10:12 PM, Moose wrote:
>
>> This has the wholehearted Moose stamp of approval for both bokeh and the
>> smooth way the OOF transitions happen.
> Well, that's pretty much a first! I do lightly agree with all your
> other critique points :-)
>
> The technical image quality of the image (negative) I have posted is
> so utterly spectacular for a tiny frame of 35mm, I couldn't give a
> darn about bokeh.
Nevertheless, I have so often made negative comments about the bokeh in the
images you post here that I am duty bound to
comment positively when the opportunity presents itself. :-)
> But I think the 135 Macro might be very good in that regard - experience will
> tell.
I used to use the 135/4.5 a fair amount for close-up images in the garden. I
liked it a lot, but don't recall specifics
about bokeh. Of course, I was usually going for the greatest DOF possible. ;-)
Hokey Bokey Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|