Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:52:35 -0400
Doesn't really matter from the standpoint of a purchase decision.  It 
appears to be as good as anything else in normal usage.

Chuck Norcutt


On 5/7/2012 1:39 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> Tsk!  How you could ask such a question of Ken?
>
> :-)
>
> But I understand that Ken means if it is a real increase in DR or the result 
> of processes that might not be useful all the time, I think.
>
> Chris
>
>
> On 7 May 2012, at 17:11, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> Do you care how it got there if it works?
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> On 5/7/2012 10:59 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>> DXO does have some of those DR specs posted and you can do direct
>>> comparisons. DPREVIEW only compares cameras of same market segment.
>>>
>>> The numbers are stout, but I question how much of that DR is
>>> manufacturered in processing and how much is actually real. From all
>>> evidences, this is the same sensor as is in the G3. If so,
>>> theoretically, it should have identical results in the raw file. But
>>> this goes back to a basic premise that I've preached for years that
>>> "Raw Ain't Raw".
>>
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz