Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Ahhh, now that's a Super Moon [was Super Moon was Full moon exp

Subject: Re: [OM] Ahhh, now that's a Super Moon [was Super Moon was Full moon exposure: was: one new image on facebook]
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 09:46:37 -0400
I wasn't referring to shutter speeds.  Just the stability of the setup 
and the ease of locating and tracking the moon.  I don't mean tracking 
during exposure (not required) but during the entire shooting session.

Chuck Norcutt

On 5/7/2012 11:58 PM, Moose wrote:
>> At 1000mm you're getting up into the range where an equatorial
>> mount is required for sky work.

> Not with the moon, apparently. Rather than calculate or look up
> shutter speeds, I simply bracketed shutter speeds. As you can see,
> 1/60 was plenty. I couldn't see any sharpness/detail difference with
> higher speeds, and other IQ factors were poorer.
>
> Looney Moose
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz