Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Pixco adapters -bad; Big_IS -good (was "Re: How Ken invented

Subject: Re: [OM] Pixco adapters -bad; Big_IS -good (was "Re: How Ken invented
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 17:55:13 -0400
The histogram works every time.  :-)

Chuck Norcutt

On 5/9/2012 4:10 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Moose wouldn't bite. I went through that whole post as Joel or AG etc.
> may wish to use the Z 50/1.4 Z 85/2 etc at F2.8 or faster. hand held
> and get consistent good focus. The stock screen is largely only good to
> providing accurate information to about F4 regardless of acuity of
> vision--perhaps slightly better as mentioned but not significantly so.
> The OM5DIII does NOT allow changing screens so the AF confirm accuracy
> becomes more relevant. Many do not like that type of work flow and wish
> to see what they are doing. An emerging preponderance of evidence is
> that a microadjusted AF confirm adapter on the OM5DIII can yield about
> the precision of using the Eg-S on the 5DII. Canyon sells shims for the
> screens for good reason as manufacturing tolerances my mean that using
> the screen may result in front or back focusing. I am happy for you if
> yours is spot on.
>
> Moose is quite astute in picking up that reporting the max aperture to
> the cam fixes the grossest of the metering errors. I have
> reservations as to whether the complex matrix metering will behave with
> a manual lens stopped way down but center weighted seems very forgiving.
>
> Just trying to be helpful, Mike
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz