On 5/20/2012 2:27 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> It absolutely is Moose's fault! Let's not let him off the hook that easily.
I am happy to take whatever blame may attach so long as ...
On 5/21/2012 5:54 AM, Dawid Loubser wrote:
> ... give up on 35mm film in general, ... It's a move I did for artistic
> reasons, to force myself to stop using it.
... so long as I get any credit due as Dawid improves his pursuit of his
vision, unencumbered by equipment unsuited to
achieving it. ;-)
> Do stick around. As you know, very little OM is actually discussed or even
> owned by half the list anymore.
On 5/20/2012 4:45 PM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> Good luck, and enjoy! If I've learned anything here, it's that you don't
> really have to use OM gear to be a treasured member. It's the fellowship of
> the lens, regardless of which kind of lens. May have started as OM specific,
> but it has evolved. We like evolution, right?<g>
What they said!
If you don't stick around, how will I get to see your progress, or find out if
your rather attractive vision reaches the
commercial success you dream of and I think it will deserve. :-)
Visionary Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|