| Subject: | Re: [OM] Re MF VS 35 |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 May 2012 14:10:05 -0500 |
Along the same vein, where did this reputation of "hammering nails" ever come from? Weight and size do not necessarily mean indestructable. Drop one and chances are something is going to be needing fixing. Half of those big dents in the bodies are the result of banging against other heavy cameras. Lighter cameras may dent, but whan punded by other light cameras will result in the same impact damage as the heavier gear. -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] FS: Four Third Zoom Lenses, philippe.amard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Re MF VS 35, Dawid Loubser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re MF VS 35, Bill Pearce |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re MF VS 35, Bill Pearce |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |