I like all 3 much better now although I think the brightness of the
first could be reduced slightly.
Chuck Norcutt
On 5/31/2012 3:44 AM, Frank Wijsmuller wrote:
> Thanks for looking& commenting all. I did light up the first one, looks
> better indeed. The petal in the right of the second one was a kind of a
> question, didn't know for sure myself what to do with it. Cropped it square
> now, less distracting for sure. It was really not very much sharpened, but
> it could be that Lightroom 4 changed the sharpness setting. I have not much
> experience with it yet. It is back to default (still quite sharp I think).
>
> And I added a crop of the third, with which I thought were very nice
> rendered flowers. Apparently only the owner of the picture can download it.
> Google+ has inadequate custom settings I think.
>
> I recently sold my ZD 50/2, because I saw no concluding difference between
> the two. And the 45mm did focus faster with less hunting (on m43 of
> course). I'm glad you didn't had a macro lemon Nathan. As for normal use, I
> have no problems with it, but I might be less demanding.
>
> Best, Frank.
>
> <
> https://plus.google.com/photos/103726771172069534440/albums/5748432896218455041?authkey=CPOD78bZ7vCi9gE
>>
>
> 2012/5/31 Nathan Wajsman<photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> The look fine, although the middle one looks like it has had a lot of
>> sharpening applied.
>>
>> Anyway, my unhappiness with the lens related more to ordinary use than
>> specifically to macro use. I just did not think it was sharp enough in
>> normal street use, at least not compared to my other MFT lenses.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nathan
>>
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>>
>>
>> YNWA
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 31, 2012, at 1:14 AM, Frank Wijsmuller wrote:
>>
>>> I quite like the macro pictures made with this lens, and would like your
>>> comments. Especially from Nathan, as he was not very satisfied with it,
>> as
>>> I understood it correctly? They are full size and downloadable (try the
>>> third one, I really like that one at 100%), if Google+ allows you to see
>>> them 100% without downloading, I'd like to know how as I haven't found
>> out
>>> yet ;-)
>>> Best, Frank.
>>>
>>> <
>>>
>> https://plus.google.com/photos/103726771172069534440/albums/5748432896218455041?authkey=CPOD78bZ7vCi9gE
>>>>
>>> --
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|