ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor

from Chuck Norcutt

Subject:	Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor
From:	Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:24:21 -0400

I think it works at extremely large value of 2 = 2.50.  After all, 2.51 
would have to be considered an extremely small value of 3.

Chuck Norcutt


On 6/12/2012 10:03 PM, Scott Gomez wrote:
> That's 2+2=5, Rick. For extremely large values of 2.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, (continued) Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Don Holbrook Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Charles Geilfuss Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Don Holbrook Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Charles Geilfuss Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Rick Beckrich Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Charles Geilfuss Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, tedgrant Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Rick Beckrich Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Don Holbrook Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Scott Gomez Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Chuck Norcutt <= Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Don Holbrook Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Don Holbrook Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Don Holbrook Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Jim Nichols Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Don Holbrook Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Ken Norton

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] An actual jpeg, Chuck Norcutt
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] IMG: Expecting, Chuck Norcutt
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Scott Gomez
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Infrequent visitor, Ken Norton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]