I think he meant that direct flash was ugly, which it is, except when used
for fill-light. When I shoot events I always bounce it off the ceiling if
possible. You shoot that kind of stuff far more than I do so I imagine you
use bounce flash when possible too.
--
Chris Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana
260-437-8990
http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio
http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work!
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
Become a fan on Facebook
On 6/18/12 9:15 PM, "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Chuck, last time I checked, on-camera flash for event/wedding photography
>was still pretty popular. For fill lighting, it is also pretty acceptable
>too. Try as I might, I can't seem to make having a couple of softboxes on
>mobile stands work for me when shooting an event. It may not be perfect,
>but on-camera flash use frequently the only way to get the shot.
>
>AG
>
>On Monday, June 18, 2012, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> Basing a flash exposure on distance says you're using direct flash
>> illumination. Ugh. Double ugh!! Use a flash meter or the histogram or
>> both.
>>
>>
>
>--
>Ken Norton
>ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
>http://www.zone-10.com
>--
>_________________________________________________________________
>Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|