I didn't have a short extension tube back then but have since added 7,
14 and 25mm Olympus manual tubes and 12, 20 and 36mm Vivitar auto tubes.
But I haven't tried either of them yet. Something should work.
Chuck Norcutt
On 6/19/2012 2:29 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> I believe Moose has read the Dam Book ( I think he could write it) and
> had posted comparisons using the 5D classic and either
> z. 50/3.5 macro or the Z. 80 and his Canyon scanner. My recollection
> was the resolution was
> more than adequate for some older film emulsions. The work flow looked
> tedious though. Perhaps the 7mm ext tube fixes the mechanical issues
> with the slide copier. I wonder how the new 800e Nykon would fare in a
> comparison. The Epson V750 looks to be the most flexible with nice
> results though the new Plustek is tempting if not too pricey. No clue
> about the company's record but they announced this at least 4 months
> ago,.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for the link. I tried it once before but my mechanical setup
> was
> rather poor... a hastily cobbled together mix of Canon 5D, Olympus
> 50/3.5 macro and OM slide copier. There are height and pentaprism
> interference problems between the Canon and OM gear. I need to try
> again and spend some time resolving the mechanical fits.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 6/19/2012 8:34 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
>> Peter Krogh (The Dam Book) recommends In-Camera Scanning
>> http://www.thedambook.com/downloads/Camera_Scanning_Krogh.pdf
>> I've tried it with a Beseler Slide Duplicator and the IDMII Canon.
> It does
>> fine for quick and easy but I get better results with the Nikon
> LS5000.
>> Peter disagrees and says the camera scans are better.
>>
>> Tina
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|