On Fri, Jun 22, 2012, at 08:50 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
> His Moosiness wrote:
> > But I am puzzled by the scans...
> > That would seem to lead to the conclusion that the problem is bright, direct
> > sun. And yet, the exposures seem correct,
> > and there are innumerable KRs in bright, tropical sun in National Geographic
> > alone, let along all the other places, that
> > don't suffer the same odd colors, contrast, etc.
>
> Moose and I don't always see schnozz to snout on these things, but on
> this, I am in total agreement.
>
> The entire set of Kodachromes you've showed so far, except for the
> reworked one with the HDR profile applied, have some funky green casts
> in the shadows. The contrasts are far too high and the saturation of
> the skin is a bit over the top. Inotherwords, we most certaintly have
> a profiling issue. It also has the look of too much LCE (local
> contrast enhancement) done with unsharp mask.
>
> The photography is really special, the digital processing isn't.
As I said before, these were the characteristics of Salivafast when I
have used it in the past.
Joel W.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Send your email first class
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|