> OK, I've let the occasional references to such a beast go by. But really,
> what are you guys smoking?
I didn't suggest that they would do it. I only suggested that I'd buy it.
> Then there is the simple problem of size. I believe when most people casually
> say they would love a FF NEX, they mean -
> if it's about the same size. That doesn't happen under any design scenario.
> Body and lenses both have to be larger for FF.
Not really. Personally, I believe the NEX-7 is too small, anyway.
Having it grow a bit is no problem.
> Are there really that many people who really want FF cameras, mirrorless or
> not? There are very, very few uses for which
> the sensors and lenses available in 4/3 and APS-C sensor sizes are not more
> than adequate.
Well, Nikon and Canon don't seem to have any problem selling FF
cameras. Sony is Sony, so who knows how successful they are. But the
fact is, that there is plenty of market there. It might not be huge,
but it is sufficient. As I recall, you bought a FF digital camera
yourself. ;) I may be one of the few on this list that didn't.
AG
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|