Did you, Frank?
And what did you think of the E-X1?
On 1 Oct 2012, at 07:01, Frank Wijsmuller <wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It is interesting to note that the resolution is 4:3, not 2:3. The real
> resolution gain from the E-M5's 800x600 is therefore less then you might
> think. But of course, it is also about the optics before the 'screen', and
> processing power behind it. On both accounts, I think these newer displays
> make big steps. The A99 more then the E-X1, was my impression (I handled
> both, but not side to side).
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/